SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 361

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of Its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007, Incorporating by Reference Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits (Filed Under Seal) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re 350 Sealed Document,, (James, Mark)

Download PDF
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Doc. 361 Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 361 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 3 Brent O. Hatch (5715) Mark F. James (5295) HATCH, JAMES & DODGE PC 10 West Broadway, Suite 400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 363-6363 Facsimile: (801) 363-6666 Stuart H. Singer (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 401 East Las Olas Boulevard ­ Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Facsimile: (954) 356-0022 Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc. Robert Silver (admitted pro hac vice) Edward Normand (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 Stephen N. Zack (admitted pro hac vice) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Bank of America Tower ­ Suite 2800 100 Southeast Second Street Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: (305) 539-8400 Facsimile: (305) 539-1307 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff. NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING OF SCO'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO NOVELL'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO SCO'S EXHIBITS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPPOSITIONS FILED MAY 18, 2007 INCORPORATING BY REFERENCE NOVELL'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO SCO'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXHIBITS Case No. 2:03CV0294DAK Honorable Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 361 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff has conventionally filed the original and two copies of the following documents: SCO'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO NOVELL'S EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO SCO'S EXHIBITS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT OPPOSITIONS FILED MAY 18, 2007 (DOCKET NO. 350, SCO V. IBM CASE) These documents have not been filed electronically because: ___ it cannot be converted to electronic format ___ the electronic file size of this material exceeds 2 megabytes (MB) _X_ the Court by order has excused electronic filing ___ it is exempt from electronic filing pursuant to § F(4)(e) of the ECF Policy & Procedures Manual (sealed document) These documents have been served conventionally on all parties. DATED this 18th day of June, 2007. HATCH, JAMES & DODGE, P.C. Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Robert Silver Stuart H. Singer Stephen N. Zack Edward Normand By: /s/ Mark F. James____________ Counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. 2 Case 2:04-cv-00139-DAK-BCW Document 361 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant, The SCO Group, Inc., hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff, Novell, Inc., on the 18th day of June, 2007, via U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid, addressed to: Thomas R. Karrenberg John P. Mullen Heather M. Sneddon ANDERSON & KARRENBERG 700 Bank One Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Michael A. Jacobs Matthew I. Kreeger Kenneth W. Brakebill MORRISON & FOERSTER 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 /s/ Mark F. James 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?