SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 493

ORDER granting 492 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 478 MOTION for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. Replies due by 2/19/2008. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 2/08/08. (jwt)

Download PDF
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Doc. 493 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Eric M. Acker, pro hac vice David E. Melaugh, pro hac vice 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Novell, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, vs. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. Case No. 2:04cv00139 Judge Dale A. Kimball ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Based upon the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time submitted by the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Novell, Inc. shall have up to and including February 19, 2008, to submit a reply memorandum in support of Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief. Dated this 8th day of February, 2008. BY THE COURT: Hon. Dale A. Kimball U.S. District Court Judge Approved as to form: /s/ Mark F. James (Signed by filing attorney with the permission of Mark F. James) Brent O. Hatch Mark F. James Attorneys for The SCO Group, Inc. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?