SCO Grp v. Novell Inc

Filing 549

ORDER granting 548 Motion for Extension of Time Regarding Deadlines for Proposed Final Judgment and Pre-Judgment Interest Submission. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 8/25/08. (jwt)

Download PDF
SCO Grp v. Novell Inc Doc. 549 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP Michael A. Jacobs, pro hac vice Eric M. Acker, pro hac vice Kenneth W. Brakebill, pro hac vice Marc J. Pernick, pro hac vice David E. Melaugh, pro hac vice 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 ANDERSON & KARRENBERG Thomas R. Karrenberg, #3726 Heather M. Sneddon, #9520 700 Chase Tower 50 West Broadway Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Telephone: (801) 534-1700 Facsimile: (801) 364-7697 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THE SCO GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff and CounterclaimDefendant, v. NOVELL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Case No. 2:04CV00139 Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff. Judge Dale A. Kimball ORDER GRANTING FURTHER EXTENSION REGARDING DEADLINES FOR PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST SUBMISSION ORDER In accordance with the parties' stipulation and good cause appearing therefor, it is ADJUDGED, ORDERED, and DECREED that the Court's July 16, 2008 Order shall be modified as follows: The deadline for Novell to file a brief describing what prejudgment interest Novell seeks shall be extended to August 29, 2008. The deadline for Novell to file a Final Judgment shall be extended to August 29, 2008. DATED: August 25, 2008 BY THE COURT: ______________________________________ Judge Dale A. Kimball United States District Court Judge Approved as to form: /s/ Mauricio A. Gonzalez (Signed by filing attorney with the permission of Mauricio A. Gonzalez) Mauricio A. Gonzalez Attorney for The SCO Group, Inc. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?