Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al

Filing 36

ORDER denying 14 Motion for Leave to File ; denying 18 Motion for Service of Process ; denying 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 26 Motion to Amend/Correct ; denying 28 Motion to Amend/Correct ; denying 30 Motion for joinder of additional parties supplementation to request for a TRO ; denying 32 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 08/20/2007. (asp)

Download PDF
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al Doc. 36 Case 2:06-cv-00526-DB-DN Document 36 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH LESTER JON RUSTON, ORDER Plaintiff, vs. CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTERDAY SAINTS, et al., Defendants. Case No: 2:06-CV-526 DB District Judge Dee Benson Magistrate Judge David Nuffer Plaintiff Lester Jon Ruston has filed several motions that are currently pending before the court including three motions for leave to file an amended complaint,1 a motion for service of process,2 a motion for appointment of counsel,3 a motion for joinder of additional parties,4 and a petition for a writ of mandamus.5 The court previously found that Ruston must prepay the entire filing fee in this case before he is allowed to proceed.6 The court therefore denies Ruston's motions. 1 Docket no. 14, filed December 7, 2006; docket no. 26, filed May 11, 2007; docket no. 28, filed June 22, 2007. D o c k e t no. 18, filed January 8, 2007. D o c k e t no. 19, filed January 16, 2007. D o c k e t no. 30, filed July 25, 2007. D o c k e t 32, filed August 6, 2007. M e m o r a n d u m Decision and Order, docket no. 33, filed August 13, 2007. 2 3 4 5 6 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00526-DB-DN Document 36 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 2 ORDER Ruston must prepay the entire filing fee before this case can proceed. Accordingly, the above-referenced motions are DENIED. August 20, 2007. BY THE COURT: _____________________________ David Nuffer U.S. Magistrate Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?