Arlin Geophysical et al v. USA
Filing
290
MEMORANDUM DECISION and Orderfinding as moot 276 Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells on 09/29/2011. (tls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
ARLIN GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY &
LAURA OLSON,
Memorandum Decision and Order
Finding as Moot Plaintiff's Motion for
Protective Order
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. 2:08-cv-414 TS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
District Judge Ted Stewart
Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells
Before the court is Plaintiff Laura Olson’s Motion for Protective Order. Ms. Olson seeks
an order from this court prohibiting the Government from taking her deposition. In response the
Government notes that it has cancelled Ms. Olson’s deposition so the motion is “technically
moot.” 1 The Government, however, intends to re-set Ms. Olson’s deposition for a later date and
therefore urges this court to address Ms. Olson’s motion.
Article III of the United States Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to actual
cases or controversies. 2 The court therefore declines to rule on Ms. Olson’s motion because
there is no actual controversy at this time. Accordingly, Ms. Olson’s Motion for Protective
Order is deemed MOOT.
DATED this 29 September 2011.
Brooke C. Wells
United States Magistrate Judge
1
Op. p. 3.
2
U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?