Gascoigne v. Gascoigne et al

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations. It is hereby ordered that the Magistrate Judges Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2010 is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Plaintiffs claims against Sandy Gascoigne are DISMISSED. Because Plaintiffs claims against Paul Gascoigne were previously dismissed, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 06/29/2010. (kpf)

Download PDF
Gascoigne v. Gascoigne et al Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION JULIE GASCOIGNE, Plaintiff, vs. PAUL GASCOIGNE and SANDY GASCOIGNE, Case No. 2:09CV734 DAK Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), which was entered on June 8, 2010. In the R&R, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff Julie Gascoigne's claims against Sandy Gascoigne be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's Order dated April 29, 2010.1 Plaintiff has not objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has expired. Having carefully considered all the relevant documents under a de novo standard of review, the court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation in all respects. For the foregoing reasons, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated June 8, 2010 is ADOPTED in its entirety, and Plaintiff's claims against Sandy Gascoigne are DISMISSED. Because Plaintiff's claims against Paul Gascoigne were previously dismissed,2 the Clerk of Court is directed to close this 1 See Docket No. 15. See Docket Nos. 12, 14. 2 Dockets.Justia.com case. DATED this 29th day of June, 2010. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?