Dazzlesmile et al v. Epic Advertising et al

Filing 43

ORDER granting 41 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner on 5/5/2010. (jtj)

Download PDF
Romaine C. Marshall (9654) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: (801) 799-5800 Facsimile: (801) 799-5700 Donald A. Degnan (appearing pro hac vice) HOLLAND & HART LLP 1800 Broadway, Suite 300 Boulder, Colorado 80302 Telephone: (303) 473-2724 Attorneys for Defendant NeverBlue Media, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION DAZZLESMILE, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, and OPTIMAL HEALTH SCIENCE, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, Plaintiffs, vs. EPIC ADVERTISING, INC., a purported Delaware corporation AKA AZOOGLE.COM, INC., AKA AZOOGLEADS US INC., and AKA EPIC/AZOOGLE; AZOOGLE.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation; AZOOGLEADS US, INC., a non-public Delaware corporation; FAREND SERVICES LIMITED, a Cyprus registered company; JESSE DAVID WILLMS, an individual; 1021018 ALBERTA LTD, a Numbered Alberta Canadian Corporation AKA JUST THINK MEDIA; ATLAST HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation, d/b/a ATLAST FULFILLMENT; NEVERBLUE MEDIA, INC., a Canadian corporation; GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; YAHOO! INC., Civil Action No. 2:09-CV-1043 Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT a Delaware corporation; MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a Washington corporation; and DOES 1-10, Defendants. The Court having reviewed the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiffs' Complaint filed by Defendant NeverBlue Media, Inc. ("NeverBlue"), hereby GRANTS the same. NeverBlue shall have until May 24, 2010 to file an Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint. DATED May 5th, 2010. BY THE COURT: ___________________________ Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner 4808354_1.DOC -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?