Isaacs v. Wells et al

Filing 5

ORDER re 3 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim filed by Vapocom, Randy Wells, Bradley B. Wells, Highpointe Homes, Darrin Sweeney. The "Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim" (docket 3 ) as it pertains to defendants Highpointe Home s LLC, Vapocom LLC and Highpointe Companies LLC is STRICKEN as improperly filed by an individual that is not a licensed attorney. These business entities may have until 5:00 p.m. on 5/13/2010 to find counsel to represent them in this matter, including filing an Answer to the Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Motion for Default Certificate if answers have not been filed by that deadline. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 4/6/2010. (ce)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION GARRY P. ISAACS, Plaintiff, vs. RANDY WELLS et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Case No. 2:10CV162 DAK This matter is before the court on M. Bradley Wells's improper filing of "Defendants' Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim" on behalf of Highpointe Homes, LLC, Vapocom LLC, and Highpointe Companies, LLC. In this action, Defendants Randy Wells, Darrin Sweeney, and M. Bradley Wells are representing themselves. M. Bradley Wells, however, has signed the "Defendants' Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim" on behalf of Highpointe Homes, LLC, Vapocom LLC, and Highpointe Companies, LLC. Mr. Wells, who is not an attorney, may not represent these business entities in federal court. A limited liability company must appear in court through a licensed attorney. See, e.g., Tal v. Hogan, 453 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2006); Harrison v. Wahatoyas, LLC, 253 F.3d 552, 556 (10th Cir.2001) ("As a general matter, a corporation or other business entity can only appear in court through an attorney and not through a non-attorney corporate officer appearing pro se."); Lattanzio v. Galen Institute, LLC v. COMTA , 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2nd Cir. 2007) ("[A] limited liability company [] may appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney."); U.S. v. Hagerman, 545 F.3d 579, 581 (7th Cir. 2008) ("[T]he right to conduct business in a form that confers privileges, such as the limited personal liability of the owners for tort or contract claims against the business, carries with it obligations one of which is to hire a layer if you want to sue or defend on behalf of the entity."). Accordingly, the "Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims" as this document pertains to Highpointe Homes, LLC, Vapocom LLC, and Highpointe Companies, LLC is stricken. These business entities may have until 5:00 p.m. on May 13, 2010 to obtain counsel to represent them in this matter, including filing an Answer to the Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Motion for a Default Certificate if Answers have not been filed by that deadline. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the "Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims" [Docket # 3] as it pertains to Defendants (1) Highpointe Homes, LLC, (2) Vapocom LLC, and (3) Highpointe Companies, LLC is STRICKEN as improperly filed by an individual who is not a licensed attorney. These business entities may have until 5:00 p.m. on May 13, 2010 to find counsel to represent them in this matter, including filing an Answer to the Complaint. Plaintiff may file a Motion for a Default Certificate if Answers have not been filed by that deadline. DATED this 6th day of April, 2010. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?