Public Engines v. Reportsee

Filing 38

NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING of Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff Public Engines (Sullivan, Alan)

Download PDF
Alan L. Sullivan (3152) Todd M. Shaughnessy (6651) J. Elizabeth Haws (11667) Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 15 West South Temple, Suite 1200 Beneficial Tower Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1004 Telephone: (801) 257-1900 Facsimile: (801) 257-1800 Mark Lambert (Cal. Bar No. 197410) Mark Weinstein (Cal Bar No. 193043) Cooley Godward Kronish, LLP Five Palo Alto Square Palo Alto, California 94306-2109 Telephone: (650) 843-5003 Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION PUBLIC ENGINES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, vs. REPORTSEE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. Case No. 2:10-cv-317 Honorable Tena Campbell NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING Plaintiff Public Engines, Inc. ("Public Engines") hereby gives notice that it has conventionally filed on this date a submission under seal of (1) Declaration of J. Elizabeth Haws in Support of Reply Memorandum in Support of Public Engine's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, with attached exhibits and (2) Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion 11555723.1 for Preliminary Injunction. These papers have been conventionally filed under seal because they contain information covered by this Court's Protective Order. Dated this 25 day of May, 2010. Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. /s/ Alan L. Sullivan Alan L. Sullivan Todd M. Shaughnessy J. Elizabeth Haws Attorneys for Plaintiff 11555723.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the 25th day of May, 2010, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF CONVENTIONAL FILING has been served on the following through ECF: Joshua A. Glikin Jeffrey J. Hunt David C. Reymann Walter Diercks /s/ Alan L. Sullivan 11555723.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?