Gego v. Gego
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, granting 8 Motion to Remand to State Court - CASE CLOSED. Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner no longer assigned to case. Copies of this order and the adopted Report and Recommendation will be provided to Chief Judge Stewart so so that he may review the restricted filer designation recommended. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 3/22/11 (alt)
Gedo v. Gedo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, ORDER
MIGUEL DAVID GEDO, et al., Defendants.
Case No. 2:10-CV-429 TC
This matter is before the court on Elisa Gedo's motion to remand the case to the Superior Court of the State of Washington in King County. The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Paul Warner. On March 1, 2011, Judge Warner issued a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended 1) granting Elisa Gedo's motion to remand and 2) designating Miguel Gedo as a restricted filer in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. Miguel Gedo filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on March 15, 2011. The court has conducted a de novo review of the issues and finds that Judge Warner's analysis and conclusions were correct. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9) is adopted as the order of the court. Elisa Gedo's motion to remand (Dkt. No. 8) is GRANTED. Because it appears that Miguel Gedo meets the criteria for becoming a restricted filer, the clerk shall provide a copy of this order and the adopted Report and Recommendation to Chief Judge Stewart so that he may review them, and, if he deems it appropriate, issue an order to show cause why Mr. Gedo should not face reasonable restrictions in filing future matters with
the United States District Court for the District of Utah. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT:
TENA CAMPBELL United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?