Young et al v. Access Mortgage et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 31 Report and Recommendations: Plaintiffs' case is dismissed for failing to comply with orders of the court and failing to prosecute the case - CASE CLOSED. Magistrate Judge David Nuffer no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/4/11 (alt)

Download PDF
Young et al v. Access Mortgage et al Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION BRADY J. YOUNG and ASHLEY K. YOUNG, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:10CV703DAK ACCESS MORTGAGE, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball, who referred it to United States Magistrate Judge David Nuffer under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) after Plaintiffs' counsel withdrew. On February 14, 2011, Judge Nuffer issued a Memorandum Decision and Report and Recommendation to Dismiss the Case, recommending that Plaintiffs' case be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's orders and for failure to prosecute. The Report and Recommendation also notified the parties that they had fourteen days after receipt of the Report and Recommendation to file any objections to it. No objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation as of the date of this Order. The court has reviewed the file de novo. The court agrees with Judge Nuffer's recommendation. Since the withdrawal of their counsel, Plaintiffs have failed to participate in this action and ignored several orders of the court. As Plaintiffs it is their duty to prosecute the case and there has been no communication with the court. The court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' case is dismissed for failing Dockets.Justia.com to comply with orders of the court and failing to prosecute the case. DATED this 4th day of March, 2011. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?