Benns v. Utah Office of Crime Victim Reparation

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 12/22/2010. (las)

Download PDF
Benns v. Utah Office of Crime Victim Reparation Doc. 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ELIZABETH BENNS, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR COUNSEL vs. UTAH OFFICE OF CRIME VICTIM REPARATION, Defendant. Case No. 2:10-CV-1242 TS Plaintiff Elizabeth Benns has filed a pro se complaint alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act1 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,2 and the Civil Rights Act of 1991.3 Plaintiff now moves for appointment of counsel. 1 42 U.S.C. § 12112. 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. Pub. L. 102-166. 1 2 3 Dockets.Justia.com Plaintiff has no constitutional right to counsel.4 However, the Court may in its discretion appoint counsel for indigent plaintiffs.5 "The burden is upon the applicant to convince the court that there is sufficient merit to [her] claim to warrant the appointment of counsel."6 When deciding whether to appoint counsel, this Court should consider a variety of factors, "including `the merits of the litigant's claims, the nature of the factual issues raised in the claims, the litigant's ability to present his claims, and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the claims.'"7 Considering the above factors, the Court concludes here that, on initial review, Plaintiff's claims may not be colorable, the issues in this case are not complex, and Plaintiff is not at this time too incapacitated or unable to adequately function in pursuing this matter. Thus, the Court denies for now Plaintiff's motion for appointed counsel. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel (Docket No. 5) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE DATED December 22, 2010. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge See Carper v. Deland, 54 F.3d 613, 616 (10th Cir. 1995); Bee v. Utah State Prison, 823 F.2d 397, 399 (10th Cir. 1987). 5 4 See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985). 6 Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting Williams, 926 F.2d at 996); accord McCarthy, 753 F.2d at 838-39. 2 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?