Ruffell et al v. BAC Home Loans Servicing et al
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 5/5/2011. (las)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
DEWAYNE RUFFELL AND AMY C.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP;
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS,
INC.; SCME MORTGAGE INC.; DOES 110;
Case No. 2:11-CV-25 TS
The Court has before it Defendants BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. and Mortgage
Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).1 Defendants contend that each of the causes of
action alleged in the Complaint have been repeatedly rejected by this Court and rely upon
meritless misinterpretations of case law and Utah statutes. In response, Plaintiffs admit that this
Court has repeatedly rejected related claims, but argues that the claims raised in Plaintiffs’
Docket No. 9.
Complaint are distinguishable from these precedents. In reviewing Plaintiffs’ arguments,
however, the Court finds no meaningful distinction between this cause of action and the
numerous actions the Court has previously dismissed. As persuasively demonstrated by
Defendants in their memoranda, the present claims have been considered, and rejected, by this
Court. The Court, therefore, finds no reason to depart from its prior holdings that these claims
fail as a matter of law.
Because Plaintiff has failed to plead a cause of action upon which relief may be granted,
it is therefore
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 9) is GRANTED.
DATED May 5, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?