Utah Coalition of La Raza et al v. Herbert et al

Filing 18

Plaintiff's MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Alicia Cervantes, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Eliana Larios, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomez, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Goddard, Darcy)

Download PDF
Linton Joaquin* Karen C. Tumlin* Shiu-Ming Cheer* Melissa S. Keaney* NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER 3435 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 2850 Los Angeles, California 90010 Telephone: (213) 639-3900 Facsimile: (213) 639-3911 joaquin@nilc.org tumlin@nilc.org cheer@nilc.org keaney@nilc.org Omar C. Jadwat* Andre Segura* Elora Mukherjee* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, New York 10004 Telephone: (212) 549-2660 Facsimile: (212) 549-2654 ojadwat@aclu.org asegura@aclu.org emukherjee@aclu.org Cecillia D. Wang* Katherine Desormeau* AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS PROJECT 39 Drumm Street San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 343-0775 Facsimile: (415) 395-0950 cwang@aclu.org kdesormeau@aclu.org Darcy M. Goddard (USB No. 13426) Esperanza Granados (USB No. 11894) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF UTAH FOUNDATION, INC. 355 North 300 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84103 Telephone: (801) 521-9862 Facsimile: (801) 532-2850 dgoddard@acluutah.org egranados@acluutah.org Bradley S. Phillips*+ MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 (* Pro hac vice motion pending) (+ Counsel for all plaintiffs except SEIU and Workers’ United) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Utah Coalition of La Raza, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Governor Gary Herbert and Attorney General Mark Shurtleff, Defendants. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OVER LENGTH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-BCW Judge: Brooke C. Wells Pursuant to DUCiv R 7-1(e), Plaintiffs, by and through counsel, respectfully move the Court for leave to file an over length Memorandum of Points and Authorities (“Memorandum”) in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs anticipate that they will file their Motion for Preliminary Injunction within the next two days, i.e., on or before May 6, 2011. Plaintiffs are unable to comply with the 25-page limit set forth in DUCiv R 7-1(b)(3)(a) because: (i) Plaintiffs challenge on myriad grounds the unconstitutionality of Utah’s expansive new state immigration system, as established in HB 497 (signed by Utah Governor Gary Herbert on March 15, 2011); (ii) Plaintiffs’ Memorandum addresses the many ways in which HB 497 violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, the Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Right to Travel; and (iii) Plaintiffs’ Memorandum demonstrates that the harms that would result to Plaintiffs (which include seven organizations and six individuals) and others if HB 497 were allowed to go into effect are so substantial and irreparable that the Court should preliminarily enjoin its enforcement. Although Plaintiffs have attempted to address all of these issues within the standard 25page limit, they have been unable to do so. Plaintiffs’ Memorandum is 40 pages long. 1 Dated: May 4, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Darcy M. Goddard AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF UTAH FOUNDATION, INC. /s/ Karen C. Tumlin NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER /s/ Cecillia D. Wang AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, IMMIGRANTS’ RIGHTS PROJECT /s/ Elora Mukherjee AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, RACIAL JUSTICE PROGRAM /s/ Bradley S. Phillips MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?