Utah Coalition of La Raza et al v. Herbert et al

Filing 51

MOTION for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief filed by Movant Asian American Justice Center. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Marsden, Milo)

Download PDF
Milo Steven Marsden (# 4879) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 136 South Main Street, Suite 1000 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1685 Telephone: (801) 933-7360 Facsimile: (801) 933-7373 marsden.steve@dorsey.com Sarah K. Shaholli* Katherine J. Santon* DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 38 Technology Dr., Ste. 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Tel: (949) 932-3600 Facsimile: (949) 932-3601 shaholli.sarah@dorsey.com santon.kate@dorsey.com Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice *Pro hac vice motion pending IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Utah Coalition of La Raza; Service Employees International Union; Workers’ United Rocky Mountain Joint Board; Centro Civico Mexicano; Coalition of Utah Progressives; Latin American Chamber of Commerce; Salt Lake City Brown Berets; Jane Doe #1; John Doe #1; Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomez; Eliana Larios; Alicia Cervantes; John Doe #2 Plaintiffs. v. Gary R. Herbert, Governor of the State of Utah, in his official capacity; Mark Shurtleff, Attorney General of the State of Utah, in his official capacity, Defendants. Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-BCW MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION OF THE ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER AND OTHER AMICI CURIAE FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES The organizations filing the Proposed Brief (collectively “Amici”) represent a wide variety of communities of color, faith, and of individuals, all united in pursuit of tolerance and equality. They request leave to file the Amicus Curiae brief in support of Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket Number 36), which was filed on May 6, 2011. Amici’s Proposed Brief, which is lodged concurrently with this Motion, addresses actual harms that will result from enforcement of HB 497’s provisions. I. INTERESTS OF AMICI As shown here and in Exhibit 1 to this Memorandum of Law,1 the organizations filing this Motion have a unique perspective on harms to communities of color that would ensue from discriminatory treatment. This litigation is of immense importance not only within the boundaries of Utah, but may shape future decisions regarding immigration issues in other states and localities nationwide. As the legal topics covered in this case have ramifications that extend beyond the present case itself, the organizations filing this Motion request leave to file the proposed brief, which they firmly believe will provide further critical insight beyond that of which parties and counsel can otherwise provide. Amici represent a diverse group of organizations and individuals. All of the groups represented pursue a united mission for the equal treatment of individuals regardless of skin color. Amici have a combined interest in enjoining the enforcement of HB 497 because of the devastating effect that the statute has on all people, regardless of immigration status, who may appear “foreign” in any way, and because of the potential the statute has to subject these individuals to investigation and detention by law enforcement officials on those grounds. The Asian American Justice Center (“AAJC”), a member of the Asian American 1 Exhibit 1 to this Memorandum of Law is fully incorporated herein and further describes the individual organizations filing this Motion. -2- Center for Advancing Justice, is a national non-profit, non-partistan organization working to advance the human and civil rights of Asian Americans and build and promote a fair and equitable society for all. The following organizations have expressed support as fellow amici for the Proposed Brief: Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services, Asian American Institute, Asian Law Caucus, Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance AFL-CIO, Asian Pacific American Legal Center, Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, Comunidades Unidas, Heartland Alliance’s National Immigrant Justice Center, Inclusion Center for Community and Justice, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Japanese American Citizens League, National Asian Pacific American Bar Association, National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum, National Council of La Raza, National Guestworker Alliance, National Korean American Service & Education Consortium, National Tongan American Society, New Orleans Workers’ Center for Racial Justice, Organization of Chinese Americans, Rights Working Group, and South Asian Americans Leading Together II. AMICI’S PARTICIPATION IS RELEVANT AND ESSENTIAL Amici’s Proposed Brief is relevant because it presents empirical information highlighting the harmful effects that enforcement of such legislation will have not only on minorities within Utah, but on the community as a whole. The enforcement of HB 497’s provisions will disproportionately affect communities of color by promoting a policy of racial profiling and corroding public safety within the state by severing bonds of trust between law enforcement and communities of color. Amici’s Proposed Brief places HB 497 in perspective alongside other laws that have been struck down because their application disparately impacted certain minority groups. Amici’s brief also brings to attention the disparate harms that will befall communities of color, including increased risk of racial -3- profiling due to lack of training of local law enforcement on immigration enforcement matters and the chilling effect HB 497 will have on public safety within Utah. The Proposed Brief also addresses HB 497 within a historical context highlighting Supreme Court decisions striking down or refusing to apply statutes aimed at excluding minority groups from the rights of the majority. Such arguments and data have not been fully included in Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction but they support a conclusion of irreparable harm. III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Amici respectfully request leave to file their Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief. DATED: May 27, 2011 Respectfully submitted, DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP By: /s/ Milo Steven Marsden Milo Steven Marsden Sarah K. Shaholli Katherine J. Santon Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER -4- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 27, 2011, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF System for filing, and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following ECF registrants: UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL’S Jerrold S. Jensen jerroldjensen@utah.gov Thomas D. Roberts ThomRoberts@utah.gov OFFICE (160-140857) 160 E 300 S P.O. BOX 140857 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84114-0857 (801) 336-0353 Attorneys for State Defendants Gary R. Herbert and Mark Shurtleff ACLU OF UTAH Darcy M. Goddard dgoddard@acluutah.org 355 N 300 W STE 1 SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103 (801)521-9862 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER Linton Joaquin joaquin@nilc.org Karen C. Tumlin tumlin@nilc.org Shiu-Ming Cheer cheer@nilc.org Melissa S. Keaney keaney@nilc.org 3435 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2850 LOS ANGELES, CA 90010 (213)639-3900 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION (NY) Omar C. Jadwat -1- ojadwat@aclu.org Andre Segura asegura@aclu.org Elora Mukherjee emukherjee@aclu.org 125 BROAD ST 18TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10004 (212)549-2664 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION (SF) Cecillia D. Wang cwang@aclu.org Katherine Desormeau kdesormeau@aclu.org 39 DRUMM ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 (415)343-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex Esperanza Granados 355 N 300 W SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84103 801-521-9862 ext. 113 egranados@acluutah.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON LLP Bradley S. Phillips brad.phillips@mto.com 355 S GRAND AVE STE 3500 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-1560 (213)683-9262 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board, Alicia Cervantes, Eliana Larios, and Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomex Dated: May 27, 2011 Signed: /s/ Katherine J. Santon Katherine J. Santon -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?