Utah Coalition of La Raza et al v. Herbert et al
Filing
58
ORDER granting 49 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sarah Kathleen Shaholli,Katherine J. Santon for Asian American Justice Center. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov; granting 50 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sarah Kathleen Shaholli,Katherine J. Santon for Asian American Justice Center. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 05/31/2011. (asp)
Milo Steven Marsden (# 4879)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
136 South Main Street, Suite 1000
Salt Lake City, UT 84101
Telephone: (801) 933-7360
Facsimile: (80l) 933-7373
marsden.steve@dorsey.com
ZOiI JUN - \ A q: 2 0
8Y:_----
DEPUTY CLERr\
Sarah K. Shaholli*
Katherine J. Santon*
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
38 Technology Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618-5310
Telephone: (949) 932-3600
Facsimile: (949) 932-3601
shaholli.sarah@dorsey.com
santon.kate@dorsey.com
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER
a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice
*Pro hac vice application pending
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Utah Coalition of La Raza; Service Employees
International Union; Worker's United Rocky
Mountain Joint Board; Centro Civico
Mexicano; Coalition of Utah Progressives;
Latin American Chamber of Commerce; Salt
Lake City Brown Berets; Jane Doe #1; John
Doe # 1; Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomez; Eliana
Larios; Alicia Cervantes; John Doe #2,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Gary R. Herbert, Governor of the State of
Utah, in his official capacity; Mark Shurtleff,
Attorney General of the State of Utah, in his
official capacity,
Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-BCW
ORDER FOR PRO HAC VICE
ADMISSION
Judge: Hon. Clark Waddoups
It appearing to the Court that Petitioner meets the pro hac vice admission requirements of
DUCiv R 83-1.1 (d), the motion for the admission pro hac vice of Sarah Kathleen Shaholli in the
United States District Court, District of Utah in the subject case is GRANTED.
DATED this 3/':&-day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT
~-¥-Hon. Clark Waddoups
U.S. District Judge
-2
Milo Steven Marsden (# 4879)
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
136 South Main Street, Suite 1000
Salt Lake City, UT 84101-1685
Telephone: (801) 933-7360
Facsimile: (801) 933-7373
marsden.steve@dorsey.com
c
U• .:l.
. ::- 'I
,
S
[-I
.J
lCfCOURi
201/ JUN - I A 9; 2 0
DISTf\/C
UTAH
BY:
DEPTTi"I';-CL ERK-
Sarah K. Shaholli*
Katherine J. Santon*
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
38 Technology Drive, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618-5310
Telephone: (949) 932-3600
Facsimile: (949) 932-3601
shaholli.sarah@dorsey.com
santon.kate@dorsey.com
Attorneys for Amicus Curiae ASIAN AMERICAN JUSTICE CENTER
a member of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice
*Pro hac vice application pending
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
Utah Coalition of La Raza; Service Employees
International Union; Workers' United Rocky
Mountain Joint Board; Centro Civico
Mexicano; Coalition of Utah Progressives;
Latin American Chamber of Commerce; Salt
Lake City Brown Berets; Jane Doe #1; John
Doe #1; Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomez; Eliana
Larios; Alicia Cervantes; John Doe #2,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Gary R. Herbert, Governor of the State of
Utah, in his official capacity; Mark Shurtleff,
Attorney General of the State of Utah, in his
official capacity,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-CW
ORDER FOR PRO HA C VICE
ADMISSION
Judge: Hon. Clark Waddoups
It appearing to the Court that Petitioner meets the pro hac vice admission requirements of
DUCiv R 83-1.1(d), the motion for the admission pro hac vice of Katherine J. Santon in the
United States District Court, District of Utah in the subject case is GRANTED.
DATED this
,sIUday of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT
~
Hon. Clark Waddoups
U.S. District Judge
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?