Utah Coalition of La Raza et al v. Herbert et al
Filing
8
MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Katherine Desormeau, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 1088-1344965, filed by Plaintiffs Centro Civico Mexicano, Alicia Cervantes, Coalition of Utah Progressives, Eliana Larios, Latin American Chamber of Commerce, Milton Ivan Salazar-Gomez, Salt Lake City Brown Berets, Service Employees International Union, Utah Coalition of La Raza, Workers United Rocky Mountain Joint Board. (Goddard, Darcy)
Darcy Goddard
Utah State Bar Number: 13426
Attorney For Plaintiffs
ACLU of Utah
355 North 300 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84103
Tel: (801) 521-9862
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
District of Utah Central Division
Utah Coalition of La Raza, et al.
Plaintiff
v.
Gary Herbert, et al.
Defendant.
Motion for Pro Hac Vice
Admission for Katherine Desormeau
and Consent of
Local Counsel
Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-BCW
Pursuant to D.U. Civ Rule 83-1.1(d), I move the admission of Katherine Desormeau as
pro hac vice counsel for Plaintiffs and consent to serve as local counsel. The application for pro
hac vice admission is attached as exhibit A to this motion, an Electronic Case Filing Registration
Form as exhibit B, and the admission fee, if required, has been paid to the court with the
submission of this motion.
Dated May 3, 2011
/s/ Darcy Goddard
Darcy Goddard
EXHIBIT A
EXHIBIT B
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH
Utah Coalition of La Raza, et al.
Plaintiff
ORDER FOR PRO HAC VICE
ADMISSION
v.
Case No. 2:11-cv-00401-BCW
Gary Herbert, et al.
Defendant.
It appearing to the Court that Petitioner meets the pro hac vice admission requirements of
DUCiv R 83-1.1(d), the motion for the admission pro hac vice of Katherine Desormeau in the
United States District Court, District of Utah in the subject case is GRANTED.
Dated: this________day of ____________, 2011.
_________________________________
U.S. District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?