Isys Technologies v. Google et al

Filing 48

NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Thomas J. Rossa re 46 Transcript,,,, 45 Transcript,,,,. (Rossa, Thomas)

Download PDF
COOLEY LLP Peter J. Willsey (pro hac vice) Brendan J. Hughes (pro hac vice) Email: pwillsey@cooley.com; bhughes@cooley.com 777 6th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-3723 Telephone: (202) 842-7800; Facsimile: (202) 842-7899 HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP Roger R. Myers (pro hac vice) Thomas J. Rossa, #2806 Robert L. Stolebarger (pro hac vice) Email: roger.myers@hro.com; thom.rossa@hro.com; robert.stolebarger@hro.com 299 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2263 Telephone: (801) 521-5800; Facsimile: (801) 521-9639 Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., ACER AMERICA CORP., AMAZON.COM, INC. and BEST BUY CO., INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, CASE NO. 2:11-CV-507 CW Plaintiff, NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION v. GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP., a California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation, JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS Defendants. Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorneys request redaction of the following transcript: June 14, 2011 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction -1#281507 v1 slc The Redaction Request will be filed with the court and court reporter by August 9, 2011. Dated: July 29, 2011 /s/ Thomas J. Rossa HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN, LLP Roger R. Myers Thomas J. Rossa Robert L. Stolebarger 299 South Main Street, Suite 1800 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Attorneys for Defendants COOLEY LLP Peter J. Willsey Brendan J. Hughes 777 6th Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-3723 cc: Court Reporter Karen Murakami -2#281507 v1 slc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?