Isys Technologies v. Google et al
Filing
48
NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Thomas J. Rossa re 46 Transcript,,,, 45 Transcript,,,,. (Rossa, Thomas)
COOLEY LLP
Peter J. Willsey (pro hac vice)
Brendan J. Hughes (pro hac vice)
Email: pwillsey@cooley.com; bhughes@cooley.com
777 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-3723
Telephone: (202) 842-7800; Facsimile: (202) 842-7899
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN LLP
Roger R. Myers (pro hac vice)
Thomas J. Rossa, #2806
Robert L. Stolebarger (pro hac vice)
Email: roger.myers@hro.com; thom.rossa@hro.com; robert.stolebarger@hro.com
299 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, UT 84111-2263
Telephone: (801) 521-5800; Facsimile: (801) 521-9639
Attorneys for Defendants GOOGLE INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., ACER
AMERICA CORP., AMAZON.COM, INC. and BEST BUY CO., INC.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada
Corporation,
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-507 CW
Plaintiff,
NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST
REDACTION
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation;
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a
Delaware Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP.,
a California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC.,
a Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO.,
INC., a Minnesota Corporation,
JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS
Defendants.
Notice is hereby given that the undersigned attorneys request redaction of the following
transcript:
June 14, 2011
Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction
-1#281507 v1 slc
The Redaction Request will be filed with the court and court reporter by August 9, 2011.
Dated: July 29, 2011
/s/ Thomas J. Rossa
HOLME ROBERTS & OWEN, LLP
Roger R. Myers
Thomas J. Rossa
Robert L. Stolebarger
299 South Main Street, Suite 1800
Salt Lake City, Utah 84101
Attorneys for Defendants
COOLEY LLP
Peter J. Willsey
Brendan J. Hughes
777 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-3723
cc: Court Reporter Karen Murakami
-2#281507 v1 slc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?