Isys Technologies v. Google et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION re 51 MOTION to Redact 46 Transcript,,,, 45 Transcript,,,, by Isys Technologies. (Anderson, Dax)

Download PDF
Todd E. Zenger (5238) Dax D. Anderson (10168) KIRTON & McCONKIE 1800 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Phone: (801) 328-3600 Fax: (801) 321-4893 Email: tzenger@kmclaw.com Email: danderson@kmclaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Civil Action No. 2:11-CV-00507 CW Plaintiff, Judge Clark Waddoups vs. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation; ACER AMERICA CORP., a California Corporation; AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and BEST BUY CO., INC., a Minnesota Corporation; Defendant. ISYS’ STIPULATION RE MOTION TO REDACT HEARING TRANSCRIPT [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] Defendants Google Inc., Acer America Corp., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (erroneously sued herein as Samsung Electronics USA, Inc.) (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed a MOTION TO REDACT HEARING TRANSCRIPT dated August 9, 2011 by which the Defendants seek an order authorizing redaction of certain portions of the transcript from the June 14, 2011 hearing on plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in the above-captioned case. Plaintiff ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., by and through its counsel, hereby states that it will not oppose the MOTION TO REDACT HEARING TRANSCRIPT dated August 9, 2011 (the “Motion to Redact”) and stipulates to the immediate entry of the [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REDACT HEARING TRANSCRIPT submitted by the Defendants along with its Motion To Redact. DATED this 11th day of August, 2011. KIRTON & McCONKIE By: s/Dax D. Anderson Todd E. Zenger Dax D. Anderson Attorney for Plaintiff ISYS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?