Peck v. Midland Funding et al

Filing 32

MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 17 Motion to Strike 16 Response (NOT to motion). Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 03/27/2012. (tls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION JACKIE PECK Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. MIDLAND FUNDING, LCC and JOHNSON MARK, LLC Case No. 2:11-CV-611 TS Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response to Answer to Amended Complaint. 1 While the Court may order a reply to an answer under rule 7(a)(7), 2 it has not done so in this case. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s filings are not permitted pleadings. 3 Plaintiff is free to re-file any of the exhibits filed with her Response as exhibits to another memorandum or motion. Based on the foregoing, it is hereby 1 Docket No. 17. 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a)(7). 3 Although Defendants have only requested that the Response at Docket No. 16 be stricken, the Court will strike the Response at Docket No. 10 on the same grounds. 1 ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Response to Answer to Amended Complaint (Docket No. 17) is GRANTED. DATED March 27, 2012. BY THE COURT: _____________________________________ TED STEWART United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?