Evans v. CenturyLink
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: granting 4 Motion to Dismiss; denying 11 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/26/13 (alt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
CRESSALYN EVANS,
Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER
ADOPTING REPORT &
RECOMMENDATION
v.
Case No. 2:12-CV-343-DN-PMW
CENTURY LINK CORPORATION,
Defendant.
District Judge David Nuffer
Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner
This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner under
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 1 On March 8, 2013, Judge Warner issued a Report &
Recommendation (R&R) 2 recommending that this court: (1) DENY Plaintiff Evans’s motion for
leave to amend the original complaint; and (2) GRANT Defendant’s motion to dismiss the
original complaint, and render MOOT Defendant’s motion to dismiss the proposed amended
complaint. 3
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the R&R within 14 days after
receiving it. 4 No objections to the R&R were filed or received by the court.
The court has conducted a de novo review of the issues and agrees with Judge Warner’s
analysis, conclusions and recommendations. Accordingly, the R&R is adopted as the order of
this court.
1
Order Referring Case, docket no. 8, filed May 22, 2012.
2
Docket no. 21, filed March 8, 2013.
3
Id. at 13.
4
Id.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R 5 is ADOPTED as the order of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Evans’s motion to amend the complaint is DENIED, 6
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is GRANTED, 7 and Defendant’s motion to
dismiss the amended complaint is MOOT. 8
Signed March 26, 2013.
BY THE COURT
________________________________________
District Judge David Nuffer
5
Docket no. 21.
6
Request to Amend Complaint, docket no. 11 filed May 24, 2012.
7
Motion to Dismiss, docket no. 4, filed April 17, 2012.
8
Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, docket no. 16, filed June 11, 2012.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?