Stone v. Third District Court et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 3 Complaint, filed by Todd Stone, 12 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, and upon a de novo review of the Judge Warners findings, the court APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Warners Report and Recommendation 12 in its entirety. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/1/14. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION TODD LUND STONE, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 2:12-cv-00390-CW-PMW THIRD DISTRICT COURT, UTAH COURT OF APPEALS, THE HONORABLE TYRONE E. MEDLEY, THE HONORABLE SANDRA N. PEULER, and COMMISSIONER T. PATRICK CASEY, Judge Clark Waddoups Defendants. This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (See Dkt. No. 6.) Consistent with Judge Warner’s treatment of the case, because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court will liberally construe his pleadings and hold them to a “less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (quotations and citation omitted). On September 12, 2013, Judge Warner issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the court deny Plaintiff’s “Motion for Certification of Questions of Law by United States Courts” (Dkt. No. 8) and dismiss the case with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (See Dkt. No. 12.) Plaintiff failed to file an Objection or other response to Judge Warners’ Report and Recommendation within the permitted timeframe. Accordingly, and upon a de novo review of the Judge Warners’ findings, the court APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Warners’ Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 12) in its entirety. This case is therefore closed. SO ORDERED this 1st day of April, 2014. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ Clark Waddoups United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?