Roundy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; finding as moot 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 11 Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint. Plaintiffs must file their first amended complaint no later than 10 days from the date of this order. Plaintiffs may then either (1) file a substantive response to the motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, or (2) file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/9/13 (alt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION TIFFANY FARLEY ROUNDY and BRADY BURKE ROUNDY, Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:12 cv-1032-DN-DBP v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION WELLS FARGO BANK, District Judge David Nuffer Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant. Before the court is Magistrate Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation 1 under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). No objections were filed. The court has reviewed all relevant materials de novo and adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. ORDER Defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint is deemed MOOT. 2 The court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for leave to file a first amended complaint. 3 Plaintiffs must file their first amended complaint no later than ten days from the date of this order. Once Plaintiffs have filed their first amended complaint, they may either (1) file a substantive response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, 4 or (2) file a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiffs must do this no later than ten days after they file their first amended complaint. 1 Docket no. 26, filed June 27, 2013. 2 Docket no. 7, filed November 26, 2012. 3 Docket no. 11, filed December 19, 2012. 4 Docket no. 17, filed January 22, 2013. Signed August 9, 2013. BY THE COURT ________________________________________ District Judge David Nuffer 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?