Muterspaw v. AT&T et al

Filing 37

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Case Closed.; finding as moot 10 Motion to Amend/Correct; finding as moot 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assig ned to case; finding as moot 20 Motion to Dismiss Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to case; finding as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to case; finding a s moot 27 Motion for More Definite Statement; finding as moot 28 Motion to Dismiss Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead no longer assigned to case; adopting Report and Recommendations re 36 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to effect proper service, and pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 6/17/13. (jlw)

FILED
U.S. DISTRICT CaURf
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

zon JUN I 8

A

In.

11

tV"

DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISIQl~RICT OF UTAH

DEPUTY CLERK

DAVID MUTTERS PAW,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff,

v.
Case No. 2:013-cv-00003

AT&T, CRICKET WIRELESS, THE SALT
LAKE CITY WEEKLY, SALT LAKE
COMMUNITY LIBRARY, SALT LAKE
TRIBUNE, SPRINT, BOB TEMPLETON, an
individual, and WELLS FARGO,

District Judge Dee Benson

Defendants.
Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate
Judge Dustin Pead on May 10,2013 recommending:
1. Plaintiff David Mutterspaw's complaint be DISMISSED for failure to effect proper
service, and pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute.
2. As a result of the dismissal, plaintiff's Motion to Amend in order to add an additional
defendant (Dkt. No. 10), Defendant Salt Lake Tribune's Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. No. 16),
Defendant Cricket Wireless' Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. No. 20), Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion
To Dismiss (Dkt. No. 27) and Defendant Wells Fargo's Amended Motion To Dismiss (Dkt. No.
28) be DENIED as MOOT.
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation within fourteen (14) days after receiving it. Neither party has filed such an

1

objection.
Having reviewed all relevant materials, including the reasoning set forth in the magistrate
judge's Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation as
described above.
It is so ordered.
DATED this

17th

day of June, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

2