One Source Industries et al v. Parkinson et al
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 15 Motion for Service of Process. The United States Marshals Service shall serve a summons, a copy of Plaintiffs complaint, and a copy of this Order upon Defendant Donald Hermann. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 1/30/13. (ss)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION
ONE SOURCE INDUSTRIES, INC., a
Colorado corporation, and O.C.C. MEDIA,
INC., a Wyoming corporation,
Plaintiffs,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
MOTION FOR ALTERNATIVE
SERVICE: DEFENDANT DONALD
HERMANN
vs.
EDWARD PARKINSON, an individual,
DONALD HERMANN, an individual, and
JILL PARKINSON, an individual,
Case No. 2:13-CV-41
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion for Alternative
Service. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1), the Court may allow service of process as allowed
by the law of Utah. The Court finds that under the circumstances of this case, Rule 4(d)(4)(a) of
the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure allows service of process by publication or by some other
means. Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion and finding it appropriate, the Motion is hereby
GRANTED, with the following requirements:
1
Plaintiffs may serve Defendant Donald Hermann by (1) mailing, via first class mail,
postage prepaid, copies of the Summons, Complaint, Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
and Notice of Hearing on Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, together with this Order, to
Mr. Hermann at his parents’ address: 2412 West 1500 North, Vernal, Utah 84078, and (2) email
copies of these documents to Mr. Hermann’s last known email address:
rmprospects@gmail.com. Service shall be deemed completed once Plaintiffs have filed proof of
service with the Court.
SO ORDERED.
DATED January 30, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________________
TED STEWART
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?