Chaparro v. Sorensen et al

Filing 12

DISMISSAL ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), failure to follow Court orders, and failure to prosecute. This case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 2/18/14. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CARLOS OJEDA CHAPARRO, DISMISSAL ORDER & MEMORANDUM DECISION Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-CV-185 DB v. District Judge Dee Benson WARDEN CUCF et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, inmate Carlos Ojeda Chaparro, filed this pro se civil rights suit, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2013), proceeding in forma pauperis, see 28 id. 1915. Reviewing the Complaint under § 1915(e), in an Order dated August 30, 2013, the Court determined Plaintiff's Complaint was deficient. The Court then gave Plaintiff directions for curing the deficiencies, sent him a "Pro Se Litigant Guide," with a blank-form civil rights complaint, and ordered him to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. On December 9, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff a time extension until January 6, 2014, to file his amended complaint. More than one month after that deadline, the Court has not heard from Plaintiff again. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), failure to follow Court orders, and failure to prosecute. This case is CLOSED. DATED this 18th day of February, 2014. BY THE COURT: _____________________________ JUDGE DEE BENSON United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?