Sorg v. Marcou et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 11 Report and Recommendations, 3 Complaint, filed by John Adam Sorg. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 5/29/13. (jlw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION

JOHN ADAM SORG,
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING & AFFIRMING
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

v.
JOE MARCOU, RICKY MARCOU,
DAVID MARCOU, and STEVE
PERRINE,

Case No. 2:13cv255DAK
Judge Dale A. Kimball

Defendants.

This case was assigned to United States District Judge Dale A. Kimball, who referred it
to United States Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On May 7, 2013,
Magistrate Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Plaintiff’s
Complaint should be dismissed pursuant to the in forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(I).
The Report and Recommendation notified Plaintiff that any objection to the Report and
Recommendation was required to be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. Plaintiff did not
file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing an objection has
passed. During the time period for filing an objection, Plaintiff filed a document entitled,
“Important Facts of Concern.” But, the document does not refer to the Report and
Recommendation or to any of the named defendants.
The court has reviewed the case de novo and the court agrees with the Report and

Recommendation in its entirety. The court hereby adopts it as the order of the court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I). As
a result, Plaintiff’s Motion for Service of Process is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint
Counsel is DENIED.
DATED this 29th day of May, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

DALE A. KIMBALL
United States District Judge

2