Mendez v. United Nations
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 8/6/13 (alt)
IN TflE",UlJIfItbfS'liJATES DISTRICT COURT
d,jjdM~ItBcrns.lOO~f OF UTAH
1013 AUG - 8
IV AN MENDEZ,
12: 3CJ
Q
DISTRICT OF UTAH :
Plaintiff,
ay, _ _
.
DEPUTY CLERK
vs.
I.
1
MEMORANDUM DECISION
AND ORDER
Case No. 2:13-CV-735 DN
1
UNITED NATIONS et al.,
1
District Judge David Nuffer
1
Defendants.
1
Plaintiff, Ivan Mendez, an inmate in Delaware, filed a civil rights complaint against
Defendants the United Nations and individual continents, countries and island groups. As
discussed below, the Court concludes that Mendez must pay the filing fee before this case
c~m
proceed.
The in forma pauperis statute authorizes a court to let an indigent prisoner file a
complaint in federal court without prepaying the filing fee.' But, it also restricts those who have
repeatedly filed complaints that are frivolous or fail to state a valid claim. The relevant portion of
the statute provides:
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action ... under this
section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while
incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal
in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds
that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which
relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger
of serious physical injury.,
1 28 U.S.C.s. §
2 Id.
§
1915(a) (2013).
1915 (g).
"These fee provisions are intended 'to reduce frivolous prisoner litigation by making all prisoners
seeking to bring lawsuits or appeals feel the deterrent effect created by liability for filing fees.' ,,,
The Court knows that Mendez filed many complaints in the United Statcs District Court
for the District of Delaware that were dismissed as frivolous or failing to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted. 4 As the Tenth Circuit states, "A federal court may take notice of
proceedings in other federal courts when those proceedings are relevant to matters at issue. ,,,
Section 1915(g) applies here because Mendez was a prisoner when filing this complaint,
and he has filed three or more prior cases in federal court that have been dismissed as frivolous.
The language of section 1915(g) is mandatory. Thus, a federal prisoner who falls within the
three-strikes provision must prepay the entire filing fee before his claims may proceed. Mendez
has not (credibly) .alleged that he "is in imminent danger of serious physical injury"; therefore, he
does not come within the exception to section 1915(g).
ORDER
Mendez is ineligible to proceed without prepaying the filing fee here because he has filed
three or more cases in federal court which have been dismissed as frivolous, and the complaint
does not fall within the three-strikes exception. Therefore, Mendez is DENIED permission to
3CosbV v. Meadors, 351 F.3d 1324, 1327
114F.3d 1247, 1249 (D.C.Cir. 1997)).
(10th Cir. 2003)
(quoting In re Smith,
4See Mendez v. This Criminal Organization, No. 07-236-JJF (D. Del. May 25, 2007)
(dismissing case under § 1915(g) & citing several cases dismissed in that district as
frivolous or failing to state a claim) .
5See White v. Colorado, 157 F.3d 1226, ·1232 (lOth Cir. 1998) (citing St. Louis
Baptist Temple, Inc. v. FDIC, 605 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir. 1979)).
further proceed IFP. He is ORDERED to pay the entire $350 statutory filing fee within thirty
days from the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in the dismissal ofthe complaint.
August 6, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
DAVID NUFFER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?