Roundy et al v. Zions Bancorporation et al

Filing 26

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; denying 17 Motion for Sanctions; denying as moot 18 Motion to Consider 7 motion as a summary judgment motion. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 2/24/14 (alt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION

CLIVE T. ROUNDY and KRISTINE M.
ROUNDY,
Plaintiffs,

ORDER
AND

vs.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

ZIONS BANCORPORATION, et al.,

Case No. 2:13-CV-1053-TC

Defendants.

The Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the claims of pro se Plaintiffs Clive and
Kristine Roundy. (See Docket No. 7.) The Defendants have also filed a motion seeking
sanctions against the Plaintiffs. (See Docket No. 17.)
The court has carefully reviewed the briefs and supporting material, as well as the
relevant legal authority supporting the motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth in the
Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum To Dismiss With Prejudice (Docket No. 7) and the
Defendants’ Reply (Docket No. 16), the motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
The court has also reviewed the Defendants’ Motion and Memorandum for Sanctions
against the Plaintiffs (Docket No. 17). The court declines to impose sanctions, so the motion is
DENIED. But if either Plaintiff files anything further in the District of Utah related to the
matters in this case, the court will reconsider its decision on sanctions.
The Plaintiff’s motion to consider the Defendants’ motion to dismiss as a motion for

summary judgment (Docket No. 18) is DENIED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

TENA CAMPBELL
U.S. District Court Judge

2