Essociate v. NDemand Affiliates et al
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 9 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 2 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/30/2014. (blh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
ESSOCIATE, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff,
v.
LINKTRUST SYSTEMS, INC.,
Case No. 2:13-MC-1050 TS
Defendant.
District Judge Ted Stewart
On November 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel. 1 The Motion was
subsequently referred to a Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 2 The Magistrate
Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 12, 2014. 3 The matter is before the
Court for consideration of that Report and Recommendation.
The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion be granted in part and denied
in part, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party has 14 days from the receipt of the Report and
Recommendation to file an objection. Neither party has done so. The Court has considered the
Motion and associated memoranda in the file, and the Report and Recommendation. It is
therefore
ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s August 12, 2014 Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 9) is ADOPTED IN FULL. It is further
1
Docket No. 2.
2
Docket No. 3.
3
Docket No. 9.
1
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 2) is DENIED AS
MOOT, as detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith.
DATED this 30th day of September, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
Ted Stewart
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?