Essociate v. NDemand Affiliates et al

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL 9 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Compel; denying as moot 2 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 9/30/2014. (blh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH ESSOCIATE, INC., a Delaware corporation, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. LINKTRUST SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 2:13-MC-1050 TS Defendant. District Judge Ted Stewart On November 25, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel. 1 The Motion was subsequently referred to a Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). 2 The Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on August 12, 2014. 3 The matter is before the Court for consideration of that Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion be granted in part and denied in part, as detailed in the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), a party has 14 days from the receipt of the Report and Recommendation to file an objection. Neither party has done so. The Court has considered the Motion and associated memoranda in the file, and the Report and Recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s August 12, 2014 Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 9) is ADOPTED IN FULL. It is further 1 Docket No. 2. 2 Docket No. 3. 3 Docket No. 9. 1 ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Docket No. 2) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions (Docket No. 2) is DENIED AS MOOT, as detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case forthwith. DATED this 30th day of September, 2014. BY THE COURT: Ted Stewart United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?