Balding v. Sunbelt Texas Inc et al

Filing 85

MEMORANDUM DECISION and Order- granting 52 Motion for Summary Judgment ; granting 53 Motion for Summary Judgment ; denying as Moot 65 Motion to Exclude. See Order for details Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 4/22/16. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION ROBERT J. BALDING, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER v. SUNBELT STEEL TEXAS, INC.; SUNBELT STEEL TEXAS, LLC; RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.; DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Case No. 2:14-CV-00090 Judge Clark Waddoups Defendants. This matter is before the court on Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc. and Sunbelt Steel Texas, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 53), Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 52); and Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Non-Retained Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 65). A hearing on all motions was held before the Honorable Clark Waddoups on April 21, 2016. Randy Andrus appeared on behalf of Plaintiff and James Barrett appeared on behalf of Defendants. After due consideration of the parties’ filings and oral arguments, and otherwise being fully advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated on the record, that Sunbelt Steel Texas, Inc. and Sunbelt Steel Texas, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 53) is GRANTED, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts (Dkt. No. 52) is GRANTED; and Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff’s Non-Retained Expert Testimony (Dkt. No. 65) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants on all counts. SO ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2016. BY THE COURT: ______________________________ Clark Waddoups United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?