Towner v. USAA Federal Savings Bank

Filing 23

MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 16 Motion to File Amended Answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 6/23/14 (alt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MARK EDWARD TOWNER, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION Case No. 2:14-cv-00148-DN-DBP v. District Judge David Nuffer USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, doing business as USAA FINANCIAL SERVICES, Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendant. This matter was referred to the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (Docket Nos. 4; 16.) On February 28, 2014, pro se Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant. (Dkt. No. 1.) On April 1, 2014, Defendant answered the complaint. (Dkt. No. 7.) On May 29, 2014, Defendant filed the present motion to amend its answer. (Dkt. No. 16.) Defendant moves to amend its answer to assert a counterclaim against Plaintiff. (Id.) Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant’s motion, and the time to respond has expired. DUCivR 71(b)(3)(B) (requiring parties to file opposition memorandums to such motions “within fourteen (14) days after service of the motion . . . .”). Given Plaintiff’s failure to respond to Defendant’s motion, this Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion to amend its answer. (Dkt. No. 16.) See DUCivR 7-1(d) (“Failure to respond timely to a Page 1 of 2 motion may result in the court’s granting the motion without further notice.”). Defendant must file its amended answer by July 8, 2014. Dated this 23rd day of June, 2014. By the Court: Dustin B. Pead United States Magistrate Judge Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?