USA v. Fraughton et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 46 Report and Recommendations.; denying 13 Fraughton's Motion to Dismiss ; denying 31 Fraughton's Motion to Dismiss ; denying 32 Fra ughton's Motion for More Definite Statement of Plaintiff's Complaint ; granting 39 United States' Motion for Default Judgment against the Office of the Overseer for the Popular Assembly of Shared Enlightenment Ministry. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/3/2015. (jds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AFFIRMING & ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION Case No. 2:14cv213DAK VERNON D. FRAUGHTON, et al., Defendants. Judge Dale A. Kimball Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Before Magistrate Judge Warner the following motions were filed: Defendant Vernon D. Fraughton’s Motion to Dismiss, Fraughton’s Second Motion to Dismiss, Fraughton’s Motion for More Definite Statement, and the United States of America’s Motion for Default Judgement as to the Office of First Presiding Overseer for the Popular Assembly of Shared Enlightenment Ministry, Vernon F. Fraughton, First Presiding Overseer (“Office of Overseer”). On February 6, 2015, Magistrate Judge Warner issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Fraughton’s motions to dismiss be denied, that Fraughton’s Motion for More Definite Statement be denied, and that the United States’ motion for default judgment be granted. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties that any objection to the Report and Recommendation was required to be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. On February 10, 2015, Fraughton filed a pleading entitled “Defendant(s) Counterclaim against Plaintiff – Compulsory Counterclaim.” On February 25, 2015, Fraughton also filed a pleading entitled “Defendant(s) Counterclaim Against Plaintiff – Caveat of Any Deposition.” Fraughton did not file any specific objections to Magistrate Judge Warner’s Report and Recommendation and the time for doing so has passed. The court has reviewed the motions at issue de novo. There is no basis for Fraughton’s objection to this court’s referral of the matter to a magistrate judge or to the magistrate judge’s authority to act on the pending motions. Furthermore, this court has subject matter jurisdiction over the case, and the United States has stated a plausible claim against Fraughton for failure to meet his federal tax obligations. Fraughton’s motion for a more definite statement is untimely and without merit because the Complaint adequately pleads the cause of action against Fraughton. Finally, the United States demonstrated that it is entitled to default judgment against the Office of Overseer. The court concludes that Magistrate Judge Warner’s Report and Recommendation correctly analyzed the motions at issue. To the extent that either of Fraughton’s recently filed “Counterclaims” could be construed to be objections to the Report and Recommendation, they are without merit. Accordingly, the court adopts and affirms the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation as discussed above as the order of this court. The court, therefore, orders that Fraughton’s motions to dismiss and motion for more definite statement are denied and the United States’ motion for default judgment against the Office of the Overseer is granted. To the extent that Fraughton’s recently filed “Counterclaims” are intended to be actual Counterclaims against the United States, the Counterclaims are untimely. The deadline to file amended pleadings in this case was October 31, 2014. Fraughton filed the recent Counterclaims with no assertion of good cause for the delay. Moreover, Fraughton was required to obtain leave 2 of court before filing the Counterclaim, which he did not seek. Accordingly, the court dismisses the Counterclaims as untimely. DATED this 3rd day of March, 2015. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?