Nauman v. Utah Highway Patrol et al

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; The court has reviewed the file de novo, and hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Peads Report and Recommendation inits entirety. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 9/25/15. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION THOMAS J. NAUMAN, Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Case No. 2:14-cv-00560-CW-DBP UTAH HIGHWAY PATROL, NEIL EKBERG, District Judge Clark Waddoups Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Defendants. This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Clark Waddoups, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Dustin B. Pead under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (Dkt. No. 19). The case arises out of Thomas J. Nauman’s complaint, in which he alleges he suffered personal injury when Neil Ekberg arrested him. (Dkt. No. 1). The Defendants filed an answer to Mr. Nauman’s complaint five days after the deadline, (Dkt. No. 3) and Mr. Nauman filed a motion for default judgment (Dkt. No. 9). After briefing from the parties, Judge Pead issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that the court deny the motion for default judgment. (Dkt. No. 21). Mr. Nauman did not file an objection. The court has reviewed the file de novo, and hereby APPROVES AND ADOPTS Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation in its entirety. SO ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2015. BY THE COURT: ______________________________ Clark Waddoups United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?