Lovato v. Vandyk Mortgage et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS to grant 18 Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 3/5/16 (alt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
CHRISTINE MATHEWS-LOVATO, pro se,
Plaintiff,
v.
VANDYK MORTGAGE CORP.,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SERVICES, INC.,
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL
MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GINNIE
MAE), JAMES H. WOODALL, AND
DOES I-X,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Case No. 2:15-cv-00266-DN-EJF
District Judge David Nuffer
Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse
Defendants.
The Report and Recommendation 1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Evelyn
Furse on January 28, 2016 recommends that Plaintiff’s claims against VanDyk Mortgage be
dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2
The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation within 14 days of service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 3
As of the date of this Order, no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation.
Because no party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation as provided
by rules of court, the analysis and conclusion of the magistrate judge are deemed correct and the
Report and Recommendation will be adopted.
1
Report and Recommendation, docket no. 20, issued January 28, 2016.
2
Id. at 1.
3
Id. at 2.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 4 is ADOPTED and the
above-captioned matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.
The Clerk is directed to close the case.
Dated March 5, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________
David Nuffer
United States District Judge
4
Report and Recommendation, docket no. 20, issued January 28, 2016.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?