Barela v. Ehrler

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 3 Complaint filed by Vincent Paul Barela, 9 Report and Recommendations. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 7/19/2016. (jds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION VINCENT P. BARELA, Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE Case No. 2:15-CV-00359-RJS-EJF GABBIE EHRLER, Judge Robert J. Shelby Defendant. Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse Plaintiff Vincent P. Barela, proceeding in forma pauperis, initiated this case by filing a pro se Complaint against Defendant Gabbie Ehrler of Callaway Apartments Leasing on May 21, 2015.1 Mr. Barela seeks to recover $9,000 in damages from Ms. Erhler for “extortion/fraud.”2 This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) on August 11, 2015.3 On June 29, 2016, Judge Furse filed a Report and Recommendation in which she recommended that this court dismiss Mr. Barela’s Complaint without prejudice because he has failed to demonstrate any basis upon which the court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction.4 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Judge Furse’s Recommendation provided that any Objection to it must be filed within fourteen (14) days of service.5 To date, neither party has filed an Objection. 1 Dkt. 3. 2 Id. 3 Dkt. 5. 4 Dkt. 9. 5 Id. at 3. Having reviewed all the relevant materials, including Mr. Barela’s Complaint and the reasoning set forth in Judge Furse’s Report and Recommendation, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and hereby DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2016. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ ROBERT J. SHELBY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?