Healy v. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 20 Report and Recommendations re 3 Complaint filed by Shannon Healy. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 5/10/2016. (eat)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION
SHANNON HEALY, an individual,
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
v.
Case No. 2:15-cv-470-JNP
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Judge Jill N. Parrish
Defendant.
On March 22, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Brook C. Wells issued an order to
show cause requiring Plaintiff Shannon Healy to show cause as to why her case should not be
dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Docket 19). Plaintiff was directed to respond to that order
within fourteen days and was warned that a failure to do so would result in a recommendation
that the case be dismissed. The Plaintiffs did not file any response.
On April 21, 2016, Judge Wells filed a Report & Recommendation. (Docket 20). Judge
Wells’s recommendation was that this case be dismissed because the Plaintiff has not filed any
briefing in the case and failed to respond to the court’s order to show cause. Judge Wells’s Report
and Recommendation provided that any objection to her recommendation was to be filed within
fourteen days of service. The time to respond has now expired and the court has received no
objections.
Based on the court’s de novo review of the record, the relevant legal authorities, and
Judge Wells’s Report and Recommendation, the court concludes that the Report and
Recommendation is a correct application of the law and the facts. Accordingly, the court
ORDERS as follows:
1. The Recommendation (Docket 20) is ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. The case is DISMISSED.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
________________________________________
JILL N. PARRISH
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?