Coeur v. Rose

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 59 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 10/18/16. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH Francois Coeur, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 2:16-cv-000117-JNP-DBP Allison Rose, Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Francois Coeur filed a one-page complaint. (Docket 3). Magistrate Judge Pead dismissed the complaint without prejudice because it failed to meet the basic pleading requirements of rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket 56). Judge Pead gave Mr. Coeur 15 days to amend the complaint, but Mr. Coeur never did. Judge Pead subsequently recommended that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice. (Docket 59). Although Mr. Coeur has lodged multiple documents titled “Minute Entries” with the court, he has not filed an objection to Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation. Based on the court’s de novo review of the record, the relevant legal authorities, and Judge Pead’s Report and Recommendation, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation, which incorporated the reasoning of Judge Pead’s prior order dismissing the complaint, is a correct application of the law and the facts. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Recommendation (Docket 59) is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. Mr. Coeur’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED October 18, 2016. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?