Galvan v. Salt Lake County Metro Jail et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND DISMISSAL ORDER - In an Order dated 5/30/2017, the Court determined the Complaint was deficient. The Court gave Plaintiff directions for curing the deficiencies, sent him a "Pro Se Litigant Guide," w ith a blank-form civil rights complaint, and ordered him to curethe deficiencies within thirty days. Plaintiff has not since amended the Complaint. The Court last heard from Plaintiff on 8/3/2016, when he filed an in forma pauperis application that w as granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under Section 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Court's Order, and to prosecutehis case. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 7/17/17. (dla)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH MARTY JOE GALVAN, MEMORANDUM DECISION & DISMISSAL ORDER Plaintiff, v. SALT LAKE COUNTY JAIL et al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-CV-128-DAK District Judge Dale A. Kimball Plaintiff, Marty Joe Galvan, filed this pro se civil-rights suit, see 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2017). Reviewing the Complaint under § 1915(e), in an Order dated May 30, 2017, the Court determined it was deficient. The Court gave Plaintiff directions for curing the deficiencies, sent him a "Pro Se Litigant Guide," with a blank-form civil rights complaint, and ordered him to cure the deficiencies within thirty days. Plaintiff has not since amended the Complaint. The Court last heard from Plaintiff on August 3, 2016, when he filed an in forma pauperis application that was granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), follow the Court’s Order, and to prosecute his case, see DUCivR 41-2. This case is CLOSED. DATED this 17th day of July, 2017. BY THE COURT: JUDGE DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?