United States of America et al v. St. Mark's Hospital et al
Filing
439
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER overruling Objection of Magistrate Judge Decision. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 3/20/2020. (las)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex
rel. GERALD POLUKOFF, M.D.,
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTION
OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION
Plaintiff/Relator,
v.
ST. MARK’S HOSPITAL;
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE,
INC.; INTERMOUNTAIN MEDICAL
CENTER; SHERMAN SORENSEN,
M.D.; and SORENSEN
CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP,
Case No. 2:16-CV-304-TS-EJF
District Judge Ted Stewart
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Objection of Magistrate Judge Order
Compelling Production of Peer Review Materials. For the reasons discussed below, the Court
will overrule the objection.
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
the Court reviews a Magistrate Judge’s orders on nondispositive matters under a clearly
erroneous or contrary to law standard. 1 “The clearly erroneous standard . . . requires that the
reviewing court affirm unless it ‘on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm
conviction that a mistake has been committed.’” 2
The Court has carefully reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Order, Defendants’ objection
thereto, the underlying briefing, and the relevant case law. Having done so, the Court cannot
1
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
2
Ocelot Oil Corp. v. Sparrow Indus., 847 F.2d 1458, 1464 (10th Cir. 1988) (quoting
United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948)).
1
conclude that the Magistrate Judge’s decision was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. It is
therefore
ORDERED that Defendants’ objection (Docket No. 413) is OVERRULED. Defendants
are directed to produce the documents required under the January 21, 2020 Order (Docket No.
404) within seven (7) days of this Order.
DATED this 20th day of March, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
Ted Stewart
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?