Robinson v. Mecham et al
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 72 is ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/27/20. (dla)
Case 2:16-cv-00450-DB Document 73 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
HAROLD ROBINSON,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff,
v.
TAD MECHAM, et. al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:16-cv-00450-DB-DBP
District Judge Dee Benson
Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead
Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on
April 29, 2020, recommending that the court dismiss this action for failure to comply with the
court’s order to file a proper motion to substitute party. (Dkt. No. 72; see also Dkt. No. 69.) The
parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within
14 days of service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. As of the date of this
Order, no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation.
De novo review of all materials, including the record that was before the magistrate judge
and the reasoning set forth in the Report and Recommendation has been completed. The analysis
and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the Report and Recommendation will be
adopted.
Case 2:16-cv-00450-DB Document 73 Filed 05/28/20 Page 2 of 2
It is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 72) is
ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DATED this 27th day of May, 2020.
BY THE COURT:
DEE BENSON
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?