Robinson v. Mecham et al

Filing 73

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Report and Recommendation 72 is ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Dee Benson on 5/27/20. (dla)

Download PDF
Case 2:16-cv-00450-DB Document 73 Filed 05/28/20 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION HAROLD ROBINSON, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, v. TAD MECHAM, et. al., Defendants. Case No. 2:16-cv-00450-DB-DBP District Judge Dee Benson Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead Before the court is the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 29, 2020, recommending that the court dismiss this action for failure to comply with the court’s order to file a proper motion to substitute party. (Dkt. No. 72; see also Dkt. No. 69.) The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. As of the date of this Order, no objection has been filed to the Report and Recommendation. De novo review of all materials, including the record that was before the magistrate judge and the reasoning set forth in the Report and Recommendation has been completed. The analysis and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the Report and Recommendation will be adopted. Case 2:16-cv-00450-DB Document 73 Filed 05/28/20 Page 2 of 2 It is hereby ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 72) is ADOPTED, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED this 27th day of May, 2020. BY THE COURT: DEE BENSON United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?