Paongo v. Navient

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 Report and Recommendations in full. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/11/17. (jlw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH MILIKA PAONGO, Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 2:16-cv-1190-JNP-PMW NAVIENT, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendant. Chief Magistrate Judge Paul M. Warner On May 10, 2017, Magistrate Judge Warner granted defendant Navient Solutions, Inc.’s alternative motion for a more definite statement. [Docket 10]. Judge Warner concluded that plaintiff Milika Paongo’s complaint failed to plead any factual allegations to support her alleged claims for relief. Judge Warner ordered her to file an amended complaint within 30 days. The plaintiff did not file an amended complaint or respond in any way. On June 30, 2017, Judge Warner filed a Report and Recommendation that Ms. Paongo’s complaint be dismissed for a failure to prosecute, comply with a court order, and state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [Docket 11]. Ms. Paongo did not file an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Based on the court’s de novo review of the record, the relevant legal authorities, and Judge Warner’s Report and Recommendation, the court concludes that the Report and Recommendation is a correct application of the law. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Recommendation [Docket 11] is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. Ms. Paongo’s complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED August 11, 2017. BY THE COURT: ________________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?