Sussman v. WFM-WO

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, dismissing 3 Complaint. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 6/29/17 (alt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL SUSSMAN, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AFFIRMING [5] MAGISTRATE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. Case No. 2:17-cv-00418-DN WFM-WO, INC. JOHN DOE et al., District Judge David Nuffer Defendants. The Report and Recommendation 1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Wells on May 30, 2017, recommends that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed.” The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days after receiving it. 2 Plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation. 3 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo all materials, including Plaintiff’s pro se objections, the record that was before the magistrate judge, and the reasoning set forth in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation. The Court agrees with the analysis and conclusion of the magistrate judge, and will adopt the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 4 is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. 1 Docket no. 5, entered May 30, 2017. 2 Report and Recommendation at 4. 3 Objections to Wells Motion to Dismiss, docket no. 6, filed June 9, 2017. 4 Docket no. 5, entered May 30, 2017. The clerk of the court is directed to CLOSE this case. Signed June 29, 2017. BY THE COURT ________________________________________ District Judge David Nuffer 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?