Jones v. Summit County et al

Filing 64

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER- granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings ; Motions terminated: 20 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Kamas City. ( IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that the parties' dispositive motions shall be filed on or before Friday, June 29, 2018. If no dispositive motions are filed, Status Conference set for 7/16/2018 at 02:45 PM in Rm 8.100 before Judge Clark Waddoups.) See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 3/29/18. (jmr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH ADAM JONES, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER v. KAMAS CITY, Case No. 2:17-cv-815-CW Defendant. Judge Clark Waddoups This matter is before the court on Defendant Kamas City’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (ECF No. 20.) The Honorable Clark Waddoups held a hearing on the motion on March 29, 2018. Daniel Baczynski appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Adam Jones, and Britton Butterfield appeared on behalf of Defendant. After due consideration of the parties’ filings and oral arguments, and otherwise being fully advised, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated on the record based on Christensen v. Juab School District, 2017 UT 47 (Utah 2017), and Acor v. Salt Lake City School District, 247 P.3d 404, 2011 UT 8 (Utah 2011), that Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED as to the two stipulated counts (see Jones’s Response Brief, p. 2 n.1, ECF No. 21) and DENIED as to the official misconduct count. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ dispositive motions shall be filed on or before Friday, June 29, 2018. If no dispositive motions are filed, a status conference will be held on Monday, July 16, 2018, at 2:45 before Judge Waddoups. It is contemplated that no further discovery is needed. If that should change, the parties may raise the issue before the court. SO ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2018. BY THE COURT: Clark Waddoups United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?