Desai v. Garfield County Government et al

Filing 66

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 59 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Kade Fulmer, Benjamin Hulet, Danny Lytle, Gerald Osborne, Robert Pero, Rebecca Rockwell, Joseph Thompson, John Valentine, Barry Conover, and Michael Cragun are dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve process. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 1/29/19 (alt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH HARDSHAD P. DESAI, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. GARFIELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT, JOSEPH THOMPSON, KADE FULMER, LELAND POLLOCK, DAVID B. TEBB, JERRY TAYLOR, UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, DANNY LYTLE, GERALD OSBORNE, BENJAMIN HULET, JOHN VALENTINE, MICHAEL CRAGUN, ROBERT PERO, REBECCA ROCKWELL, and BARRY CONOVER, Case No. 2:17-cv-01164-DN-EJF District Judge David Nuffer Defendants. The Report and Recommendation 1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Evelyn J. Furse on January 10, 2019, recommends that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Danny Lytle, Gerald Osborne, Benjamin Hulet, John Valentine, Michael Cragun, Robert Pero, Rebecca Rockwell, Barry Conover, Joseph Thompson, and Kade Fulmer be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve process. The parties were notified of their right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation within 14 days of its service pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. 2 On January 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed three documents: “Motion to Schedule Hearing to 1 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Individual Defendants (“Report and Recommendation”), docket no. 59, filed Jan. 10, 2019. 2 Id. at 6. Clear confusion of amendment 11 (Defendant’s Claim);” 3 “Motion to Schedule Hearing to Clear Confusion of Relief Claimed;” 4 and “Motion to Schedule Hearing to Clear confusion of Court Jurisdictions (State v. Federal District Court).” 5 Nothing in the content of these documents can be construed as objecting to the Report and Recommendation’s findings, analysis, or conclusion. No other filings were made within the 14-day objection period. Therefore, the analysis and conclusion of the Magistrate Judge are accepted and the Report and Recommendation 6 is ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation 7 is ADOPTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Danny Lytle, Gerald Osborne, Benjamin Hulet, John Valentine, Michael Cragun, Robert Pero, Rebecca Rockwell, Barry Conover, Joseph Thompson, and Kade Fulmer are DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve process. Signed January 29, 2019. BY THE COURT ________________________________________ District Judge David Nuffer 3 Docket no. 62, filed Jan. 18, 2019. 4 Docket no. 63, filed Jan. 18, 2019. 5 Docket no. 64, filed Jan. 18, 2019. 6 Docket no. 59, filed Jan. 10, 2019. 7 Id. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?