Didericksen v. Earnshaw et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241, filed by Clara Didericksen - Dismissed without prejudice 8 Report and Recommendations Adopted in FULL. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/25/21. (alf)

Download PDF
Case 2:18-cv-00218-JNP Document 10 Filed 08/25/21 PageID.77 Page 1 of 2 FILED 2021 AUG 25 AM 9:58 CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CLARA DIDERICKSEN, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS EARNSHAW; UTAH STATE HOSPITAL, AND BEAR RIVER MENTAL HEALTH, Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Case No. 2:18-cv-00218-JNP-DAO Judge Jill N. Parrish Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg issued a Report and Recommendation that the court dismiss plaintiff Clara Didericksen’s action without prejudice. Judge Oberg notified Didericksen that a failure to file a timely objection to her recommendation could waive any objections to it. No objection was filed within the allotted time. Because no party objected to the Report and Recommendation, any argument that it was in error has been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it is not clearly erroneous. Thus, the court finds that the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule and ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 8, is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. The court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Case 2:18-cv-00218-JNP Document 10 Filed 08/25/21 PageID.78 Page 2 of 2 DATED August 25, 2021. BY THE COURT: ______________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?