Sapp-Smith v. Wasatch Property Management et al

Filing 21

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and granting Defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 3/1/2019. (eat)

Download PDF
______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH MELISSA SAPP-SMITH, Plaintiff, vs. WASATCH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, et al., MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Case No. 2:18CV413-DAK-BCW Judge Dale A. Kimball Defendant. This case was assigned to United States District Court Judge Dale A. Kimball, who then referred it to United States Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Wells issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, be granted and that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Report and Recommendation notified Plaintiff that any objection to the Report and Recommendation was required to be filed within fourteen days of receiving it. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an objection and the time for doing so has passed. A Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is subject to de novo review by this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the record de novo. The court agrees with Magistrate Judge Wells’ recommendation to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court construes pro se filings liberally. See Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). However, Plaintiff has not alleged actionable federal claims or facts to support such claims. Accordingly, the court adopts and affirms Magistrate Judge Wells’ Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The court grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 13] and Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. DATED this 1st day of March, 2019. BY THE COURT: DALE A. KIMBALL United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?