Arcamone-Makinano et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al

Filing 50

ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 44 ; granting without prejudice ASPCA's 33 Motion to Dismiss Party - remand to state court not appropriate at this time; denying BLM's 34 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ; denying Plaintiffs' 36 Motion for Default Judgment; denying as moot 41 Motion for Ruling. Signed by Judge Jill N. Parrish on 8/1/22. (alf)

Download PDF
Case 2:21-cv-00458-JNP-CMR Document 50 Filed 08/02/22 PageID.644 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH AMELIA ARCAMONE-MAKINANO; BONIFACIO MAKINANI; GUILLERMO AVILA PAZ; RANDAL MASSARO; and CLIFTON ADUDDEL, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:21-cv-00458-JNP-CMR UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS, Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero issued a Report and Recommendation that the court deny defendant United States Bureau of Land Management’s (“BLM”) motion to dismiss (ECF No. 34), grant defendant American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals’s (“ASPCA”) motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33), deny plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment (ECF No. 36), and deny as moot plaintiffs’ motion for a ruling (ECF No. 41). ECF No. 44. Judge Romero notified the parties that a failure to file a timely objection to her recommendation could waive any objections to it. No objection was filed within the allotted time. Because no party objected to the Report and Recommendation, any argument that it was in error has been waived. See United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996). The court will decline to apply the waiver rule only if “the interests of justice so dictate.” Moore v. United States, 950 F.2d 656, 659 (10th Cir. 1991). The court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it is not clearly erroneous. Thus, the court finds that Case 2:21-cv-00458-JNP-CMR Document 50 Filed 08/02/22 PageID.645 Page 2 of 2 the interests of justice do not warrant deviation from the waiver rule and ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the court ORDERS as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 44, is ADOPTED IN FULL. 2. BLM’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 34, is DENIED. 3. ASPCA’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 33, is GRANTED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and REMAND to state court is not appropriate at this time. 4. Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, ECF No. 36, is DENIED. 5. Plaintiffs’ motion for a ruling, ECF No. 41, is DENIED AS MOOT. DATED August 1, 2022. BY THE COURT: ______________________________________ JILL N. PARRISH United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?