Dahoui v. Brown et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS as to 5 Complaint, dismissing this case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Tena Campbell on 3/27/24 (alt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
CENTRAL DIVISION
AHOUEFA DAHOUI,
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS
ACTION

Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 2:23-cv-00748-TC-DAO

KATY BROWN, WHOLE BODY
RESEARCH (aka GOLDEN CARE), and
FNU SPENCER,

District Judge Tena Campbell
Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg

Defendants.

On March 11, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg issued a Report &
Recommendation (R&R, ECF No. 10) recommending that the court dismiss the above-captioned
case because Ms. Dahoui has failed to: 1) allege facts supporting subject-matter jurisdiction;
2) “state a claim on which relief may be granted[,]” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and 3) explain
what claims are being asserted against which Defendants. Ms. Dahoui had fourteen days to file
objections to the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
More than 14 days have passed, and Ms. Dahoui has not filed objections. The court
therefore reviewed the R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Advisory Comm. Notes 1983
Addition Subdivision (b). Finding no clear error, the court adopts Judge Oberg’s R&R in its
entirety and dismisses this case without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
ORDER
The court ADOPTS the R&R (ECF No. 10) and DISMISSES this case without prejudice.
DATED this 27th day of March, 2024.
1

BY THE COURT:
_______________________
TENA CAMPBELL
U.S. District Court Judge

2