McGregor v. Intermountain Health Care
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg on 11/15/2023. (alf)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
(DOC. NO. 2)
NATHANAEL D. MCGREGOR,
Case No. 2:23-cv-00829
Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg
Plaintiff Nathanael D. McGregor, who filed this case without an attorney, moves for
appointment of counsel. 1 He filed a form motion which states “the court has already approved
the plaintiff’s application to file the matter in forma pauperis.” 2 But Mr. McGregor did not
apply to proceed in forma pauperis (without paying the filing fee) in this case; instead, he paid
the filing fee when he filed his complaint. 3 Mr. McGregor provides no other reason for his
request to appoint counsel.
While defendants in criminal cases have a constitutional right to representation by an
attorney, 4 “[t]here is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a civil case.” 5 Appointment
(Doc. No. 2.)
(See Docket Text, Doc. No. 1.)
See U.S. Const. amend. VI; Fed. R. Crim. P. 44.
Durre v. Dempsey, 869 F.2d 543, 547 (10th Cir. 1989).
of counsel in civil cases is left to the court’s discretion. 6 Indigent parties in civil cases may
apply for the appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), which allows a court to
“request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford counsel.” The applicant has the
burden to convince the court his/her/their claim has enough merit to warrant appointment of
counsel. 7 When deciding whether to appoint counsel, the court considers a variety of factors,
including “the merits of the litigant’s claims, the nature of the factual issues raised in the claims,
the litigant’s ability to present [the] claims, and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the
Mr. McGregor has not demonstrated he is unable to afford counsel, where he paid the
filing fee. And he has not shown any of the other factors set forth above support appointment of
counsel. For these reasons, Mr. McGregor’s motion for appointment of counsel 9 is denied.
DATED this 15th day of November, 2023.
BY THE COURT:
Daphne A. Oberg
United States Magistrate Judge
Shabazz v. Askins, 14 F.3d 533, 535 (10th Cir. 1994).
McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985).
Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted).
(Doc. No. 2.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?